Journal on The counterculture in the sixities Essay

Journal on The counterculture in the sixities - Essay Example ld are not as free as they think because they are slaves to convention, unable to speak freely about sex or politics, which is an indirect reference to the horrors of war which people tolerate without speaking up. In the second article, Schneeman describes how actors graphically demonstrate the body toll in war by dragging bodies along the stage, while the third article (1967) describes the fate of six men who were drafted into the war from Brooklyn and ultimately died. Another theme is the need to introduce more realism into theatre, without any need to dress it up with the propaganda that forms a part of daily life. All three articles argue towards this end – life is dramatic enough to be portrayed realistically (Beck 1965). There is the underlying implication in all three articles that people are living their lives without being true to themselves, and there is a need for theatre to highlight grim realities and bring people face to face with their inner selves, whether through seeing jail inmates as human beings or witnessing horrific events occurring. An acceptance of reality and adopting a non condemning attitude towards drug users is also an implicit theme in all three articles that argue for more realistic portrayals through theatre and for people to face up to unpleasant images. The Sixties counterculture was focused towards a release of such inhibitions which were deemed to afflict conventional society. I was struck by the singular role of theatre in contributing to the anti-war movement, which is evident in all the articles. They must have packed an impact during the sixties, when such visceral images as those described by Scheeman must have been quite a shock compared to the predictable quality of typical theatre devoid of realism. Realism in theatre and film is now commonplace and it made me realize how much we owe to the movement in the Sixties, to radically change long entrenched ideas. I also found some of the views expressed in the articles to

State Responsibility Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

State Responsibility - Essay Example State rights and responsibilities are implicit in all types of treaties and conventions. In fact such rights and obligations on the part of states form the basic foundation on which such treaties and conventions are negotiated. The Permanent Court of International Justice observed in the case concerning the factory at Chrozow that â€Å"it is a principle of law that any breach of an engagement involved an obligation to make reparation. Reparation was the indispensable complement of a failure to apply a convention and there is no necessity for this to be stated in the convention itself†. Further the court observed that the rules governing the reparation are the rules of Public International Law in force between the two states concerned and not the law governing the relations between the states which has committed a wrongful act and the individual who has suffered damage. The court has indicated what this obligation amounted to. It observed ; â€Å"The reparation must, in so far as possible, wipe out all the consequences of the illegal act and re-establish the situation which would in all probability, have existed, if that act had not been committed. Restitution in kind, or if that is not possible, pa yment of a sum corresponding to that value which a restitution in kind would bear, the award, if need be, of damages for loss sustained which would not be covered by restitution in kind or payment in place of it†. The court in its observation mentioned restitution or compensation as modes of reparation.... The Permanent Court of International Justice observed in the case concerning the factory at Chrozow that "it is a principle of law that any breach of an engagement involved an obligation to make reparation. Reparation was the indispensable complement of a failure to apply a convention and there is no necessity for this to be stated in the convention itself". Further the court observed that the rules governing the reparation are the rules of Public International Law in force between the two states concerned and not the law governing the relations between the states which has committed a wrongful act and the individual who has suffered damage. The court has indicated what this obligation amounted to. It observed ; "The reparation must, in so far as possible, wipe out all the consequences of the illegal act and re- establish the situation which would in all probability, have existed, if that act had not been committed. Restitution in kind, or if that is not possible, payment of a sum corresponding to that value which a restitution in kind would bear, the award, if need be, of damages for loss sustained which would not be covered by restitution in kind or payment in place of it". The court in its observation mentioned restitution or compensation as modes of reparation, but it is generally accepted that reparation may also take the form of satisfaction. State responsibility in Public International Law has assumed a much greater role today. The UN conference on Environment and Development or the Rio Declaration (1992) imposes state responsibility in controlling emission of green house gases. It envisages compensation to the victims due to accidents occurring as a result of state activity. It imposes greater responsibility on